Tuesday, April 19, 2011

The Accessibility of Utopia to Modern Day Readers

The Accessibility of Utopia to Modern Day Readers

Sir Thomas More’s “Utopia” was written around 500 odd years ago in a different country and language, yet it is still a valid link to a contemporary understanding of the nature of human beings, of social norms, and morals. Through More's Utopia, it becomes evident that the trans-historical and trans-cultural nature of the text emerges through More's conscious and subconscious inclusion of universal human truths, in particular those of happiness, money and values, which allows the reader a higher quality of textual engagement and insight.

While More may be intending to simply tell the story of a traveler's voyages and sagas, it is his inclusion of these certain universal values and beliefs that readily transcend from his 15th century pen to the my understanding of the story.  In the text itself, a surprising incorporation by More is the inclusion of himself as an actual major character, with the other being the protagonist Raphael Hythlodaeus, a bearded traveler of the world. The inclusion of More in the story is one of the reasons why the story is so accessible. The character of More certainly reflects Sir Thomas More and due to Sir More’s ability to incorporate his beliefs, the story begins to exhibit a greater meaning. It is due to More’s pure genius partially.

Another way that the story survives throughout time is through many of the underlying themes. One theme being the difference between a person’s moral take on society and the real take on society. Everyone has an idea of what they expect or want society to be like. Then, there is the reality of society. This difference can strain people and frustrate them. Utopia is so easy to relate to because everybody wants to have their ideal society realized. It can be argued that More’s Utopia didn’t totally match his ideal. However, it was a society that he was much more accepting of.

One tool that More effectively uses is satire to connect modern day readers. Satire like More’s is used today which makes it very relatable. The Colbert Report is an excellent example of the use of political satire which More would probably greatly appreciate. The name “Utopia” literally means “no place” which sets the tone for the stories satirical nature. One example of satire that relates to modern day satire is when the Utopians ban their lawyers because they are "clever practitioners and sly interpreters of the law." This is a satirical remark because it is both funny, yet sets the standard talk about something serious. Other satirical remarks that can relate to modern readers are criticisms of church practices, political corruption, and social ills. Parody and humor allow More to expose areas of legitimate concern, even if it is indirectly. Political satire usually stirs an opinion in any person which is possibly the strongest connecting theme of them all.

2 comments:

  1. Nice rumination. The one thing I would disagree with though is your comment that, "the character of More certainly reflects Sir Thomas More." While it is possible, it is far from certain, and I would argue that the character More doesn't link up all that closely with the actual Thomas More. What makes me think this is his commentary at the end of Raphael's story in which he criticizes the communal living of Utopia, I interpreted Thomas More as actually agreeing with this proposition. It's just a matter of interpretation but I don't think we can assume the two Mores are the same.

    ReplyDelete
  2. to continue with what Steve says above: i think it is also important to realize the fictive nature of both the Thomas More character and Hythloday. I think the real Thomas More lies somewhere between these two characters' opinions in the text, but again this is up to interpretation...
    also i think it is important to note that More derived the word Utopia by referencing two different Greek words, Eutopia (meaning "good place")and Outopia (meaning "no place"). i think it is important to recognize this fact because it shows how More is trying to define not only the perfect society but one that does not and could never exist.

    ReplyDelete